Iraq’s public information space, organized by evidence.
Continuous Arabic, English, and Hebrew collection, with Hebrew headlines machine-translated into English, story clustering, source comparison, and explainable confidence ratings. The score measures available evidence—not political truth.
Live intelligence stream
Every card links to the original publication and exposes the factors behind its evidence score.
No stories are available yet.
Deploy through Git, allow the scheduled collector to run, or trigger the protected collection endpoint once.
Public Officials Monitor
Inclusive monitoring collects Arabic, English, and Hebrew reports whenever a verified full-name variant clearly identifies one of the monitored figures. Sensitive subjects and public social results are included rather than withheld.
—
Current source landscape
Ratings describe observable provenance and publishing structure. Official sources are authoritative for what an institution said, not independent confirmation of the underlying event.
| Publisher / domain | Source type | Items | Average evidence | Latest item |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waiting for collection data… | ||||
How each item is rated
The system rates the evidence visible in collected metadata. It does not rate ideology, popularity, or whether a conclusion agrees with the operator.
Read full methodology →Source provenance
0–23Known publisher, direct domain, and observable source type.
Independent corroboration
0–30Distinct domains carrying materially similar reporting.
Attribution and detail
0–23Named institutions, reports, data, and useful descriptive metadata.
Recency and direct access
0–15Timeliness and whether the original publisher link is available.
Caution penalties
0–22Uncertainty language, sensational framing, and unsupported casualty claims.